Cases 31 - 40 of 2,004
Palmer v. Farrow
as 6:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
David M. Palmer
Defendant:
Nancy Farrow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Reheard
as 6:2024cv00082
Petitioner:
Brian Tyrone Scott
Respondent:
Deborah A. Reheard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duke v. McIntosh County, et al. et al
as 6:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Anthony Scott Duke
Defendant:
McIntosh County, et al., McIntosh County Jail and McIntosh County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Sipes et al
as 6:2024cv00018
Respondent:
B Sipes, Braniy, Ms Lt. Earnest and others
Petitioner:
Jimmie McCay, III
Plaintiff:
Jimmie McCoy, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dye v. McIntosh County et al
as 6:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Jason Grant Dye
Defendant:
McIntosh County, Kevin Ledbetter, Monica Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Quick
as 6:2024cv00014
Petitioner:
Byron Anderson
Counter Defendant:
Christe Quick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Johnson v. Core Civic, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00021
Petitioner:
Kurk Johnson
Respondent:
Core Civic, Inc., Mark Knutson, Trabel Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Beaver v. McIntosh County et al
as 6:2024cv00020
Defendant:
Dylan Carl Beaver, McIntosh County et al., McIntosh County Sherriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scrivener v. Bryant et al
as 6:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Scrivener
Defendant:
Chris Bryant, Devra Atwood and Jenny Saunders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steudeman v. Sequoyah County Detention Center et al
as 6:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Dustin Steudeman and DJ
Defendant:
Sequoyah County Detention Center and Jeremy Day
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
