Cases 31 - 40 of 6,338
Simmons v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00425
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Bobby Dale Simmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Lay v. Stephens County et al
as 5:2024cv00417
Plaintiff:
Develin Dion Ray Lay
Defendant:
Stephens County, Ken Graham and Javier Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Love v. Harvanek
as 5:2024cv00257
Petitioner:
Lonnie Love
Respondent:
Kameron Harvanek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2024cv00407
Petitioner:
Turischevia J Harris
Respondent:
Department of Corrections, Mable Bassett Correctional Center and Tamika White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bruner v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2024cv00184
Petitioner:
Jamele R Bruner
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gravlee v. Tibbs et al
as 5:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
John Christian Gravlee
Defendant:
FNU Tibbs, FNU Prince, FNU Kala and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. SSI Disability et al
as 5:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lonnell Lewis
Defendant:
SSI Disability and ODOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walker v. Pottawatomie County Public Safety Center Trust
as 5:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Joseph Bear Walker
Defendant:
Pottawatomie County Public Safety Center Trust
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Harding
as 5:2024cv00270
Petitioner:
David L Daniels
Respondent:
FNU Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Truitt v. Mcdougle et al
as 5:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
Jessie F Truitt, III
Defendant:
Mike Mcdougle, Susanne Campbell, FNU Madden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
