Cases 41 - 50 of 17,671
Spalding v. Administrative Office of the US Courts, et al
as 24-6081
Petitioner:
DAVID L. SPALDING
Respondent:
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE US COURTS, WARDEN GOLDEY, FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE and others
DeLaCruz v. Commandant
as 5:2024cv03030
Petitioner:
Randy J. DeLaCruz
Respondent:
Commandant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
GRAHAM v. BIDEN et al
as 5:2024cv00426
Petitioner:
Jonathan Graham
Respondent:
Joe Biden, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Zogheib (PS) v. Lepe
as 1:2024cv00697
Petitioner:
Jihad Anthony Zogheib
Respondent:
C. Lepe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lara, Jr. v. Eddy County Detention Center et al
as 2:2024cv00249
Petitioner:
Manuel G Lara, Jr.
Respondent:
Eddy County Detention Center and Attorney General State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Betts (PS) v. Long
as 1:2024cv01164
Petitioner:
Terry Betts
Respondent:
Jeff Long
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Armstrong v. Rankins
as 6:2024cv00148
Petitioner:
Ryan T. Armstrong
Respondent:
William Chris Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cromar v. Davis County Correctional Facility
as 1:2024cv00064
Petitioner:
Paul Kenneth Cromar
Respondent:
Davis County Correctional Facility
Not Yet Classified:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McMurtry v. No Named Defendant
as 24-1175
Petitioner:
GREGG PHILIP MCMURTRY
Respondent:
NO NAMED DEFENDANT
Love v. Harvanek
as 5:2024cv00257
Petitioner:
Lonnie Love
Respondent:
Kameron Harvanek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
