Cases 41 - 50 of 18,448
MITCHELL v. RITE AID et al
as 2:2024cv00774
Plaintiff:
PAUL F. MITCHELL
Defendant:
RITE AID and NJ POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMITH v. STRUBINGER et al
as 2:2024cv01655
Plaintiff:
ALISHA SMITH
Defendant:
SERGEANT GEOFFREY STRUBINGER, DETECTIVE THOMAS D'ALESIO and NORMA PELUYERA-ALAMO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THEN v. HOOVER et al
as 2:2024cv01651
Plaintiff:
CARLOS THEN
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER JASON HOOVER, POLICE OFFICER MATTHEW WALSH, POLICE OFFICER JOEY BIANCHIMANO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Katona v. Apgar et al
as 3:2024cv00677
Plaintiff:
Matthew Katona
Defendant:
Joseph Apgar, Ashley Rzesewski, Shane Schneider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gowran v. Pittston Area School District
as 3:2024cv00674
Plaintiff:
John Gowran
Defendant:
Pittston Area School District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parrish v. Muldrow et al
as 1:2024cv00670
Plaintiff:
Donte Darrell Parrish
Defendant:
Mike Muldrow, York County Municipality and Judge Jennifer Clancy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DAVIS v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv01563
Plaintiff:
KEITH DAVIS
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, COMMON PLEAS JUDGE TRACY BRANDEIS ROMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CHAPPLE
as 2:2024cv01599
Plaintiff:
ANGELA CHAPPLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
CHAPPLE v. GEICO
as 2:2024cv01601
Plaintiff:
ANGELA CHAPPLE
Defendant:
GEICO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Sciarra v. Dauphin County Public Defender et al
as 1:2024cv00664
Plaintiff:
Christopher Sciarra
Defendant:
Dauphin County Public Defender, Steve Allan Mimms, Deanna Muller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
