Cases 41 - 50 of 1,647
Cementation Canada, Inc. v. Clough USA Inc.
as 4:2023cv04608
Plaintiff:
Cementation Canada, Inc.
Defendant:
Clough USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Chavis v. T-Mobile US, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01513
Plaintiff:
Najah Chavis
Defendant:
T-Mobile US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Moore v. Capital One et al
as 3:2023cv02607
Plaintiff:
Randy Moore and Randy Moore, Sr
Defendant:
Capital One and Andrew Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Green v. Snap RTO LLC
as 4:2023cv04452
Plaintiff:
Derail Green
Defendant:
Snap RTO LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Berkshire Bank v. GL Fitness Corporation et al
as 4:2023cv04675
Plaintiff:
Berkshire Bank
Defendant:
GL Fitness Corporation, Guillermo Leal, IV and Elba Leal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Decuir v. JP Morgan Bank, N.A.
as 4:2023cv04534
Plaintiff:
Abraham Decuir
Defendant:
JP Morgan Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 2305 Review of Federal Contract
Wesco v. John Collins
as 3:2023cv02582
Plaintiff:
Monterio J Wesco
Defendant:
John Collins and Navy Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Moore v. Merrick Bank et al
as 3:2023cv02667
Plaintiff:
Randy R Moore
Defendant:
Merrick Bank and David Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Timms v. ZRS Management
as 3:2023cv02413
Plaintiff:
Caleb Jones Timms
Defendant:
ZRS Management and ZRS Managment LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dari Concepts, LLC et al v. EF Global Corporation et al
as 4:2023cv04176
Plaintiff:
Dari Concepts, LLC and Angela Kilic-Cave
Defendant:
EF Global Corporation, EFG TieTek, LLC, TieTek Global LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
