Cases 41 - 50 of 10,134
Lemons v. Anglea et al
as 3:2024cv00340
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Lemons
Defendant:
C. Anglea, Mr. Brooks and FCI Sheridan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lopez v. Reyes et al
as 2:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Constantino Lopez
Defendant:
Erin Reyes, T. Hudson, Patrick Maney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Black v. Massey et al
as 3:2024cv00668
Plaintiff:
Johnathan R. Black
Defendant:
Caprice Massey, Patrick Garrett, Seth Honl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stratton v. Miller
as 2:2024cv00667
Petitioner:
Jaime Michelle Stratton and Jared Michael Clark
Respondent:
Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Oregon Department of Corrections
as 2:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Jermel Arcilicia Taylor doing business as New Muslim Party, Corp
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Jermel Arcilicia Taylor
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. CNN et al
as 2:2024cv00620
Plaintiff:
Jermel A. Taylor
Defendant:
CNN and Fox News
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Oregon Corrections Enterprise
as 2:2024cv00621
Plaintiff:
Jermel A. Taylor
Defendant:
Oregon Corrections Enterprise
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinsey-Pace v. Douglas County Sheriff Office
as 6:2024cv00653
Plaintiff:
David D. McKinsey-Pace
Defendant:
Douglas County Sheriff Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. State of Oregon et al
as 2:2024cv00407
Plaintiff:
Jermel Arcilicia Taylor, Melo, Musa and others
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Oregon Department of Corrections, Snake River Superintendent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
