Cases 41 - 50 of 693
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv02466
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
BIRDSBORO KOSHER FARMS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651 Occupational Safety/Health
SMITH, II v. NOFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION
as 2:2023cv02195
Plaintiff:
JAY SMITH, II
Defendant:
NOFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 20109 Federal Railroad Safety Act of 1970
PETROSKI v. SPEEDWAY LLC
as 2:2023cv01628
Plaintiff:
SHARON PETROSKI
Defendant:
SPEEDWAY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
BARLIP v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION
as 2:2023cv01648
Plaintiff:
BRUCE BARLIP
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 20109 Federal Railroad Safety Act of 1970
BLACKSHEAR v. HONOR FOODS
as 2:2023cv01431
Plaintiff:
BEN BLACKSHEAR
Defendant:
HONOR FOODS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
LANNING v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
as 2:2023cv00568
Plaintiff:
Michael Lanning and Marcia Francis
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
GRANT v. NURSEPARTNERS, INC.
as 2:2023cv00129
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL GRANT
Defendant:
NURSEPARTNERS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
BERMUDEZ V. HOME DEPOT, INC.
as 2:2022cv05180
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BERMUDEZ
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Corvin v. Osmose Utilities Services, Inc.
as 1:2022cv02060
Plaintiff:
Timothy Corvin
Defendant:
Osmose Utilities Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Lewis v. EthosEnergy Power Plant Services, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv01865
Plaintiff:
William Lewis
Defendant:
EthosEnergy Power Plant Services, LLC and Caithness Services, LLC d/b/a Caithness Moxie Freedom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
