Cases 41 - 50 of 2,608
Noble v. Napier
as 1:2023cv12134
Petitioner:
Thomas E Noble
Respondent:
Stephanie Napier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
King v. Napier
as 1:2023cv12103
Petitioner:
Bruce E King
Respondent:
S Napier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wallace v. Tompkins et al
as 1:2023cv12325
Petitioner:
Nickoyan Wallace
Respondent:
Steven W. Tompkins, Robert L. Ullmann, Mary K Ames and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ventura v. FMC Warden
as 1:2023cv12065
Petitioner:
Albert Ventura
Respondent:
FMC Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mahdi v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv11905
Petitioner:
Abdul Jaleel Mahdi
Respondent:
Department of Corrections, Commissioner of Correction, MCI Norfolk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Melendez v. Kennedy
as 1:2023cv12132
Petitioner:
Felix A. Melendez
Respondent:
Stephen Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez v. Divris
as 4:2023cv40107
Petitioner:
Eduardo Rodriguez
Respondent:
Superintendent Matthew Divris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sheehan v. FMC Devens Warden
as 1:2023cv11959
Petitioner:
Daniel Sheehan
Respondent:
FMC Devens Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Balcacer v. Divris
as 4:2023cv11843
Petitioner:
Jose Balcacer
Respondent:
Matthew Divris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Torres Rojas v. FMC Devens Warden
as 1:2023cv11979
Petitioner:
Johanny Torres Rojas
Respondent:
FMC Devens Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
