Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Ohio
Cases 41 - 50 of 17,756
Carver v. Warden, Allen Correctional Institution
as 1:2024cv00072
Petitioner: James Edward Carver
Respondent: Warden, Allen Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holloway v. Korecz et al.
as 1:2024cv00670
Plaintiff: Case Holloway
Defendant: Police Officer Korecz, Police Officer Young, Police Officer Chesser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Numann v. Bureau of Prisons
as 4:2024cv00672
Plaintiff: Gregory Numann
Defendant: Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lumpkin Jr. v. Core Civic Northeast Ohio Correctional Center
as 4:2024cv00406
Plaintiff: David Thomas Lumpkin Jr.
Defendant: Core Civic Northeast Ohio Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Davis
as 1:2024cv00663
Petitioner: Kiaran Young
Respondent: Warden Anthony Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Larr v. Mackey
as 2:2024cv01730
Petitioner: Michael L. Larr
Respondent: Warden Misty Mackey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lindsey v. Jones et al.
as 1:2024cv00322
Plaintiff: Aaron Lindsey
Defendant: Officer Jones and Jane/John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arnoff v. Ferguson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv00401
Plaintiff: Bruce Arnoff
Defendant: Denise Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Larr v. Mackey
as 1:2024cv00656
Petitioner: Michael L. Larr
Respondent: Warden Misty Mackey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goins v. Winkel
as 1:2024cv00653
Plaintiff: Justin Goins
Defendant: Corporal Winkel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?