Cases 51 - 60 of 599
GRAJALES-EL v. AMAZON PRIME
as 2:2022cv03455
Plaintiff:
HENRY GRAJALES-EL
Defendant:
AMAZON PRIME
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
CONIKER et al v. MONFORTOH et al
as 2:2022cv01184
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CONIKER, RESOURCE SOLUTIONS, LLC and PRESIDENT MICHAEL CONIKER
Defendant:
BISHOP JEFFREY MONFORTOH, RANDY CHRISTENSEN, JOSEPH EDWARD HUDAK, ESQ. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SCOTT v. BAILEY et al
as 2:2022cv03654
Plaintiff:
NORMAN LEE SCOTT, SR
Defendant:
WHITNEY R BAILEY, DONALD GLOVER and THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
SKINNER v. HADLOCK
as 2:2022cv03087
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD SKINNER
Defendant:
ANNA HADLOCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
GIVENS v. WAL-MART STORES, INC
as 2:2022cv01006
Plaintiff:
THOMAS ALLEN GIVENS
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
JAMOH v. Ude
as 5:2022cv03070
Plaintiff:
BASHIR YUSUF JAMOH
Defendant:
Jackson Ude
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Ramsey v. Amtrak
as 1:2022cv00900
Plaintiff:
Philip E. Ramsey, Esq.
Defendant:
Amtrak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
AGENOR v. SUPREME AUTO TRANSPORT, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv02400
Plaintiff:
Pierre Agenor
Defendant:
SUPREME AUTO TRANSPORT, INC., Acey Barnes and ACEY BARNES doing business as 1ST FAMILY TRANSPORTING, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Matich v. O'Brien et al
as 3:2022cv00697
Plaintiff:
Kelly Matich
Defendant:
Gina Marie Berumen O'Brien, Trisia Sepulveda and Christina Berumen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
KOUNOUPIS et al v. EVANGELATOS
as 5:2022cv01757
Plaintiff:
GEORGE S. KOUNOUPIS and HAHALIS & KOUNOUPIS, P.C
Defendant:
MALIK EVANGELATOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
