Cases 51 - 60 of 2,451
Teman v. Infused Innovations, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Kevin R. Teman doing business as Artificially Intelligent Matchmaker
Defendant:
Infused Innovations, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Chrustowski v. LifeHouse Church et al
as 1:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Renee A. Chrustowski
Defendant:
LifeHouse Church, Middletown Police Department, Clayton Fire House and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chrustowski v. Best Buy
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Renee A. Chrustowski
Defendant:
Best Buy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
E. C. v. Houser, et al.
as 1:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Emmett Caldwell and E. C.
Defendant:
Trustee Barbara Houser, Boy Scout Plan of Reorganization, Zoom Video Communications Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Sam's Auto Wholesale, Inc. v. The Auto Gallery
as 1:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Sam's Auto Wholesale, Inc.
Defendant:
The Auto Gallery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Chrustowski v. USPS et al
as 1:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Renee A. Chrustowski
Defendant:
USPS, USPS Headquarters, Giant Foods and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Nasir v. Nasir et al
as 1:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Malik Nasir
Defendant:
Naima Nasir, Register of Wills, Court of Chancery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
