Cases 51 - 60 of 29,409
Huff v. Dr. Comfort
as 1:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Charles Eric Huff
Defendant:
Dr. Comfort
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury-Product Liability
Go et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01888
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Antonia Go and Sally Go
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thomas et al v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company et al
as 2:2024cv01897
Plaintiff:
Bobby Thomas and Lana Thomas
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company and The Chemours Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Bonilla v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01896
Plaintiff:
Estevan Bonilla
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johns v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01902
Plaintiff:
Amy Johns
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rodriguez v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01903
Plaintiff:
Enrique Rodriguez
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Henning-Urbanek v. Speedway LLC et al
as 2:2024cv11036
Plaintiff:
Robin Henning-Urbanek
Defendant:
Speedway LLC and Marathon Oil Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Sederburg v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01857
Plaintiff:
Mary Sederburg
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Marshall v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01873
Plaintiff:
Tammy Marshall
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Giddings v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01880
Plaintiff:
Donald Giddings
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
