Cases 51 - 60 of 37,300
Rachel Goode v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 24-11221
Plaintiff:
RACHEL GOODE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Patrick Leach v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 24-11251
Plaintiff:
PATRICK J.P. LEACH
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Amanda Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 24-11233
Plaintiff:
AMANDA SMITH
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Petrucci v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv00728
Plaintiff:
Helen Marie Petrucci
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Carlton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2024cv00943
Plaintiff:
Brandon Carlton
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Aguilera v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2024cv00944
Plaintiff:
Julio Aguilera
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Atkinson v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv21458
Plaintiff:
Jodi Sue Atkison
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
IMGRAM v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Lindsay Ingram
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Anderson v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv01601
Plaintiff:
Michael Anderson, Jr
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Thomas v. O'Malley (CONSENT)
as 2:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
Donnie Thomas
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
