Cases 51 - 60 of 4,097
HILL v. BEASLEY et al
as 7:2023cv00026
Plaintiff:
ANTIJUAN HILL
Defendant:
Warden JACOB BEASLEY, LYNN GIBSON, HEATHER DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ORTIZ v. MYERS
as 1:2023cv00026
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL ORTIZ
Defendant:
DARRIN M MYERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOOD v. FORT et al
as 5:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
BRANDON CRAIG WOOD
Defendant:
KARL FORT, JAMES TAYLOR and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GHOLSTON v. WARD et al
as 5:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
DEANTE GHOLSTON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY C WARD and FEARS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GLOVER v. BURKS et al
as 4:2023cv00019
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A GLOVER
Defendant:
Deputy Warden LITIHA BURKS and Captain DESMOND COFIELD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOOTEN v. WARD et al
as 5:2023cv00064
Plaintiff:
DAVID WOOTEN
Defendant:
ALICIA WARD, MIMS, TIMOTHY C WARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
DARIAN THOMAS
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHNSON STATE PRISON, Warden BRIAN CHAMBERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. WHITTINGTON
as 5:2023cv00102
Plaintiff:
MAURICE CORNEILUS WILLIAMS, JR
Defendant:
LAWRENCE WHITTINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCURTY v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 5:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
DREXEL MCCURTY
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY C WARD, aGOVERNOR BRIAN P KEMP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOUSTON v. LAWSON et al
as 5:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY MANDELA HOUSTON
Defendant:
UNIT MANAGER MELISSA LAWSON, LIEUTENANT ONEAL, LIEUTENANT WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
