Cases 61 - 70 of 728
WALKER v. CHESTER COUNTY POCOPSON HOME
as 2:2023cv00687
Plaintiff:
DOROTHY WALKER
Defendant:
CHESTER COUNTY POCOPSON HOME and COUNTY OF CHESTER
BRANSON v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
as 2:2023cv01404
Plaintiff:
John Branson
Defendant:
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
WHITE v. HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2023cv00732
Plaintiff:
APRIL WHITE
Defendant:
HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
SELBY v. SIMITREE ACQUISITION LLC
as 2:2022cv04011
Plaintiff:
FATIMAH SELBY
Defendant:
SIMITREE ACQUISITION LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00668
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
DEROSA V. NOGA AMBULANCE SERVICE, INC.
as 2:2023cv00255
Plaintiff:
LUKE DEROSA
Defendant:
NOGA AMBULANCE SERVICE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act 1993 (FMLA)
Barrick v. Cumberland County Department of Public Safety et al
as 1:2022cv02005
Plaintiff:
Chelsey Barrick
Defendant:
Cumberland County Department of Public Safety and County of Cumberland
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
LARKE III v. TASTY BAKING COMPANY
as 2:2022cv05114
Plaintiff:
LUCIUS LARKE III
Defendant:
TASTY BAKING COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
DABNEY v. THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL
as 2:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
SARINA DABNEY
Defendant:
THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
BARLETT v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
MALORYE BARLETT
Defendant:
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY, LLC, WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY INVOLUNTARY SEPARATION PLAN and ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE OF WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act 1993 (FMLA)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
