Cases 61 - 70 of 323,513
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01851
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01850
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01840
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01853
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01852
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01838
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
IN RE: QUINZEL CAIBY
as 2:2024cv01844
Plaintiff:
QUINZEL CAIBY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CROWLEY v. NEFCO CORPORATION, THE NEFCO HOLDING COMPANY LLC, and NEFCO HOLDING LLC
as 2:2024cv01859
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CROWLEY
Defendant:
NEFCO CORPORATION, THE NEFCO HOLDING COMPANY, LLC and NEFCO HOLDING LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION
as 2:2024cv01861
Plaintiff:
PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION
Defendant:
Stephen J. Fay, Karen Fay, James S. Fay, Jr., and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION
as 2:2024cv01860
Plaintiff:
PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION
Defendant:
Fay Construction Co., Inc. and Fay Development Company, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
