Cases 61 - 70 of 10,383
MITCHELL v. UPPER DARBY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2024cv01113
Plaintiff:
PAUL F. MITCHELL
Defendant:
UPPER DARBY POLICE DEPARTMENT, BLACK WOMEN, POLICE OFFICERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DAVIS v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv01563
Plaintiff:
KEITH DAVIS
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, COMMON PLEAS JUDGE TRACY BRANDEIS ROMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CHAPPLE
as 2:2024cv01599
Plaintiff:
ANGELA CHAPPLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
CHAPPLE v. GEICO
as 2:2024cv01601
Plaintiff:
ANGELA CHAPPLE
Defendant:
GEICO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
WHITE v. FITZGERALD MERCY HOSPITAL
as 2:2024cv01067
Plaintiff:
CALVIN WHITE
Defendant:
FITZGERALD MERCY HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COVINGTON v. PLYMOUTH TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2024cv01571
Plaintiff:
ROXANNE COVINGTON
Defendant:
PLYMOUTH TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT and POLICE OFFICER DOUGLAS WELLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CALI v. THE COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 2:2024cv01615
Plaintiff:
GERALDINE MARY CALI and MARY GERELYN BLANEY
Defendant:
THE COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LYLES v. GREYHOUND BUS LINES et al
as 2:2024cv01524
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SHEAR LYLES
Defendant:
GREYHOUND BUS LINES and ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SINCLAIR v. RADIO
as 5:2024cv01514
Plaintiff:
PETER SINCLAIR
Defendant:
RONALD RADIO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WENDY ARIANA SPENCE v. YEADON BOROUGH et al
as 2:2024cv01530
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF WENDY ARIANA SPENCE
Defendant:
YEADON BOROUGH, ROBERT WELLBROCK, DANIELLE PETTYJOHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
