Cases 61 - 70 of 6,057
Hyman v. New York Life Group Insurance Company of New York
as 2:2024cv01157
Plaintiff:
Catina Hyman
Defendant:
New York Life Group Insurance Company of New York
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
D. v. Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield et al
as 0:2024cv00639
Plaintiff:
R. D.
Defendant:
Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield and Wells Fargo & Company Health Plan, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Shugart v. Chester County
as 0:2024cv00826
Plaintiff:
William D. Shugart
Defendant:
Chester County
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Bowman v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
as 6:2024cv01160
Plaintiff:
Rashon Bowman
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
King v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America
as 3:2024cv00770
Plaintiff:
Brandon King
Defendant:
Prudential Ins. Co. of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Cole v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
as 6:2024cv01046
Plaintiff:
Robin Cole
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Metz v. Hardeeville, City of et al
as 9:2024cv01178
Plaintiff:
David Metz
Defendant:
Hardeeville, City of and Steve Camp
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Castro v. JPMorgan Chase Short-Term Disability Plan, The
as 6:2024cv00648
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Cedeno Castro
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Short-Term Disability Plan, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Scott v. County of Charleston
as 2:2024cv01507
Plaintiff:
Shevon Scott
Defendant:
County of Charleston
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Dotson v. Town of Lake View
as 4:2024cv01358
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Dotson
Defendant:
Town of Lake View
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
