Cases 61 - 70 of 80,566
Calloway v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02107
Plaintiff:
Ulysses Calloway
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Byard v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02106
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey Byard
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Eckstein v. Franklin County Corrections II et al.
as 2:2024cv01072
Plaintiff:
Andrew J Eckstein
Defendant:
Franklin County Corrections II, Armor Health, Dallas Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bastin v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02102
Plaintiff:
Deborah Bastin
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Beauchemin v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02103
Plaintiff:
Danny Beauchemin
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Akers v. C.R. Bard, Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02100
Plaintiff:
James Akers
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc and Davol, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harr v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02110
Plaintiff:
Larry Harr
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jenkins v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02112
Plaintiff:
Leonard Jenkins
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Marris v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02115
Plaintiff:
Sheila Marris
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Conley et al v. Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02078
Plaintiff:
Larry Conley and Charlene Conley
Defendant:
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
