Cases 61 - 70 of 3,712
Innovative Sports Management Incorporated v. Ghuman et al
as 2:2022cv02027
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management Incorporated doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Defendant:
Sukhi Ghuman individually and doing business as Union Jack and ISM Group Incorporated an unknown business entity doing business as Union Jack
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Communications Act of 1934
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Giovanni Ortega et al
as 2:2022cv08648
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Defendant:
Giovanni Ortega individually and doing business as Peru's Taste, Evelyn M. Mimata individually and doing business as Peru's Taste and Perus Taste Inc. an unknown business entity doing business as Peru's Taste
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521 Violations of Cable Communications Act of 1984
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Nunez et al
as 3:2022cv07136
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Defendant:
Fernando Vasquez Nunez, Humberto Vasquez and Emelina's Peruvian Restaurant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Communications Act of 1994
G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Wilmar E. Coreas
as 2:2022cv08013
Plaintiff:
G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Wilmar E. Coreas individually doing business as Spruce Barber Lounge
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521 Violations of Cable Communications Act of 1984
G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Sergio Franco et al
as 2:2022cv07920
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC and G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Sergio Franco, Jesus Franco, Klownski Foundation Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521 Violations of Cable Communications Act of 1984
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Augusto Cesar Gutierrez
as 2:2022cv09379
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. d/b/a Integrated Sports Media and Innovative Sports Management, Inc. doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Defendant:
Augusto Cesar Gutierrez and Augusto Cesar Gutierrez individually doing business as Arepas Colombian Delicatessen
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521 Violations of Cable Communications Act of 1984
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Nefris Yanire Bran et al
as 2:2022cv08529
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Defendant:
Nefris Yanire Bran individually doing business as Donde Angie Ecuadorian Food and Mariscos Los Guasavenos an unknown business entity doing business as Donde Angie Ecuadorian Food
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521 Violations of Cable Communications Act of 1984
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Snyder et al
as 3:2022cv01702
Defendant:
Elite Venues L.L.C. an unknown business entity doing business as Salt Drift Pointe formerly known as Beast Mode Events L.L.C., Terrence R. Snyder individually and doing business as Salt Drift Pointe, Richard M. Inzunza individually and doing business as Salt Drift Pointe and others
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0553 U.S.C.A. Cable Communications Policy Act
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Aidas Mattis et al
as 2:2022cv08090
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. d/b/a Integrated Sports Media and Innovative Sports Management, Inc. doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Defendant:
Aidas Joseph Mattis, Edita Lipas Mattis, Douglas Martin Milton and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521 Violations of Cable Communications Act of 1984
G&G Closed Circuit Events LLC v. Villegas et al
as 2:2022cv01892
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed Circuit Events LLC and G&G Closed Circuit Events LLC
Defendant:
Israel Higuera Villegas individually doing business as Inches Tacos, Veronica Valenzuela individually doing business as Inches Tacos and Tacos y Mariscos Topolobampo LLC an unknown business entity doing business as Inches Tacos
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Communications Act of 1934
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
