Cases 61 - 70 of 1,335
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv00043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102 Americans With Disabilities Act
Burton Hill et al v. Wendt et al
as 2:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Chad Burton Hill and Louiza Bissette
Defendant:
David Wendt, Paul Burt, Ted Caldwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Olson v. Missoula Field Office et al
as 9:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
David A. Olson and David A Olson
Defendant:
Missoula Field Office, Northern Region and Kristen Baker-Dickinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shideler et al v. Gootkin et al
as 2:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
Gregory Dean Shideler and Terrie Holscher
Defendant:
Brian Gootkin, Wayne Harris, Kenneth Hess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Sharp v. Poverello Center
as 9:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
Samuel H Sharp
Defendant:
Poverello Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Zahn v. Flathead County et al
as 9:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
Amanda L. Zahn
Defendant:
Flathead County, Jeffrey J. Perry, Travis Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Kast v. Erbacher et al
as 9:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Caitlin M. Kast
Defendant:
Patrick Erbacher and City of Missoula
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
