Cases 61 - 70 of 5,458
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hill v. Irby Construction Company
as 3:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Chelsa Hill
Defendant:
Irby Construction Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Hearin v. Lammico et al
as 1:2024cv00073
Defendant:
Lammico, Lammico Insurance Agency, Inc., Joseph Larriviere and others
Plaintiff:
Heather Peno Hearin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Todd v. City of Natchez, Mississippi et al
as 5:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Frederick Todd
Defendant:
City of Natchez, Mississippi, Officer Raven Carver, Natchez Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Secherest et al v. City of Lexington et al
as 3:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Leroy Secherest, Damion Levy, Tyqwon Walden and others
Defendant:
City of Lexington, Robin McRory, Charles Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
