Cases 61 - 70 of 3,756
Shephard v. Cox et al
as 4:2023cv00178
Plaintiff:
Adam Shephard
Defendant:
Warden Brenda Cox, Captain Carter and Captain Lathem
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Test v. Test
as 1:2023cv33333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff Test
Defendant:
Defendant Michael Test
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
McPhail v. Grenada County Sheriff
as 3:2023cv00385
Petitioner:
Justin McPhail
Respondent:
Grenada County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gordner v. Panola Circuit Courts
as 3:2023cv00421
Petitioner:
James Mortez Gordner and James Gardner
Respondent:
Panola Circuit Courts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Malone v. United States Marshal Service et al
as 3:2023cv00373
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dewayne Malone, Sr.
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service, Trinity Food Service and Tallahatchie CCF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2023cv00387
Petitioner:
Tawana Terrell Johnson
Respondent:
State of Mississippi, Tate Reeves and Lynn Fitch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pinson v. USA
as 1:2023cv00127
Petitioner:
Dartonio Pinson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Taylor v. State of Mississippi
as 1:2023cv00099
Petitioner:
Thomas Taylor *DO NOT FILE*
Respondent:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jushaway v. MDOC
as 3:2023cv00277
Petitioner:
Joe Louis Jushaway
Defendant:
MDOC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Westmoreland v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2023cv00279
Petitioner:
Sherry Westmoreland
Respondent:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
