Cases 61 - 70 of 17,759
Chavez v. Arviza
as 1:2024cv00345
Petitioner:
Jorge Chavez
Respondent:
Warden Arviza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Stockton v. Yoder et al
as 1:2024cv00723
Plaintiff:
Ronald Stockton
Defendant:
Lieutenant Yoder, C.O. Lazicki and Hearing Examiner Yodis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haitos v. Hainsworth et al
as 1:2024cv00372
Petitioner:
Austin Patrick Haitos
Respondent:
Melissa Hainsworth and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith, Sr. v. McGinley et al
as 3:2024cv00420
Petitioner:
Mark Edward Smith, Sr.
Respondent:
Thomas McGinley and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carey v. USA
as 3:2024cv00722
Petitioner:
Jesse Carey
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Mattucci v. Youngkin et al
as 1:2024cv00404
Plaintiff:
Charles Mattucci
Defendant:
Warden Youngkin, Mary Babbs, Nurse Caroline and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Warden, USP Canaan
as 1:2024cv00720
Petitioner:
Reginald Edward Green
Respondent:
Warden USP Canaan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s
Cooper v. SCI-Muncy et al
as 3:2024cv00711
Plaintiff:
Kaitlyn Cooper
Defendant:
SCI-Muncy, Wendy Nickolas, C.O. Kurtz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper et al v. SCI-Muncy et al
as 3:2024cv00719
Plaintiff:
Kaitlyn M Cooper and B.L.D.C.
Defendant:
SCI-Muncy, Warden Nicholas, ADA Foose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pryce v. Schuylkill County Prison
as 1:2024cv00423
Plaintiff:
Jason John Pryce
Defendant:
Schuylkill County Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
