Cases 61 - 70 of 25,035
Thomas v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00266
Petitioner:
Timothy James Thomas
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Compton v. S.W.V.R.J.A.
as 7:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Dean Compton, Jr.
Defendant:
S.W.V.R.J.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Bell
as 7:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Brian Richardson
Defendant:
Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Physicians to Women, Inc.
as 7:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Latoya Johnson
Defendant:
Physicians To Women Inc. and Physicians to Women, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Financial Pacific Leasing, Inc. v. Smoove and Easy Delivery Company LLC et al
as 7:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Financial Pacific Leasing, Inc.
Defendant:
Smoove and Easy Delivery Company LLC, Fred Fenner, Joslyn Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Henry v. Paige et al
as 7:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Daniel A. Henry
Defendant:
Treandre D. Paige, VA DOC Department of Correction, Wallens Ridge State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hartsfield v. United States Army
as 3:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Scott Hartsfield
Defendant:
United States Army
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Byrne v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 5:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
John M. Byrne, Jr.
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Dunmore v. Hamilton et al
as 7:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Bruce Dunmore
Defendant:
Clerk Brenda S. Hamilton, Deputy Clerk of Roanoke Circuit Court, Deputy Dillon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moultrie v. Red Onion State Prison
as 7:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Jules Moultrie
Defendant:
Red Onion State Prison and D.O.C./Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
