Cases 71 - 80 of 165,266
Hood v. Haskell County et al
as 1:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Scottie Lee Hood
Defendant:
Haskell County, Shane Hadaway, Chris Keith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Russ et al
as 4:2024cv00404
Plaintiff:
Leroy D. Washington
Defendant:
FNU Russ, Lt. FNU Glover, FNU Kelce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santana-Cerano v. Rule et al
as 4:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
Maribel Santana-Cerano
Defendant:
Warden FNU Rule, Warden FNU Cates, FNU Nodiand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quezada v. USP Tucson
as 5:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Graciano Pina Quezada
Defendant:
USP Tucson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Smith v. Johnston et al
as 7:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Jace Smith
Defendant:
Captain Holly Johnston, Captain Daryl Bonnin, Sheriff Sydney Kirk Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Skelton v. Johnston et al
as 7:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Casey Skelton
Defendant:
Captain Holly Johnston, Deputy Stefanie Vickars, CO Joey Fields and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lester v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00470
Petitioner:
Timmy Heath Lester
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. Paxton
as 6:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Markiesha (Mark) Bailey
Defendant:
Ken Paxton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kindred v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 6:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Herman Kindred
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID, Erik K. White, The State of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tryon v. Bell County Law Enforcement Center
as 6:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Eric De'Monee Tryon
Defendant:
Bell County Law Enforcement Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
