Cases 71 - 80 of 109
Johnson v. Mclane - TCCO Executive Director
as 5:2019cv00182
Respondent:
Marsha Mclane - TCCO Executive Director
Petitioner:
Timothy Leonard Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hitt v. McLane et al
as 1:2019cv00735
Defendant:
Correct Care (Wellpath) Recovery Solutions, Daniel Rakes, Karen Harmon and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Hitt
Amicus Curiae:
- Amicus Curiae Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. McLane, Executive Director-TCCO et al
as 5:2019cv00156
Defendant:
Dr. Jack Pieniazek, Ms. Marsha Mclane - TCCO Executive Director, Ms. Aniasa Ornelas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
San Miguel v. Mclane - TCCO Executive Director et al
as 5:2019cv00096
Plaintiff:
Samuel San Miguel
Defendant:
David Bowers, Marsha Mclane - TCCO Executive Director, Christopher Catron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Luera et al
as 5:2019cv00044
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Williams
Defendant:
Kristina Luera and Mandi Castillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. United States of America
as 4:2019cv00226
Plaintiff:
Charles Jackson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Edwards v. Texas Civil Commitment And Correct Care et al
as 5:2018cv00275
Defendant:
Texas Civil Commitment And Correct Care and State of Texas
Plaintiff:
Kevin W Edwards, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Woods et al
as 5:2018cv00269
Defendant:
Tina Kovar, Tine Buds, Gena Brisson and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Joe Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Mclane - TCCO Executive Director et al
as 5:2018cv00230
Defendant:
NFN Coswell, Marsha Mclane - TCCO Executive Director, Brian Thomas and others
Plaintiff:
Seth Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunsmore et al v. Mclane - TCCO Executive Director
as 5:2018cv00167
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Dunsmore and Felicia (Dunsmore) Richardson
Defendant:
Marsha Mclane - TCCO Executive Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
