Cases 71 - 80 of 12,842
Mattox v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Marcus Anthony Mattox
Defendant:
USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Thruston v. Grayson County Detention Center
as 4:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Karlchaze Thruston
Defendant:
Grayson County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. Barthuly et al
as 5:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Harold Eugene Hayes
Defendant:
Brad Barthuly, Devin Nielsen, Alysta Butts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Triana-Ceballos v. Paul
as 5:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Triana-Ceballos
Defendant:
Warden David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
James v. Warden, USP McCreary
as 6:2024cv00039
Petitioner:
Crandall James
Respondent:
Warden, USP McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Damrell v. Richmond PD et al
as 5:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Derick Damrell
Defendant:
Richmond PD, Richmond Sheriffs Department and Madison County DPA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nolan v. USA
as 1:2024cv00052
Petitioner:
Adrian Nolan
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Adams et al
as 3:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Avren Scott
Defendant:
(Officer) Dylan Adams, (Officer) Gregory A. Stokes, (Officer) Dylan T. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. McCracken County Jail
as 5:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Adam L. Lee
Defendant:
McCracken County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
