Cases 71 - 80 of 7,515
Brown v. Wier et al
as 7:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Terrance Brown
Defendant:
Judge Robert Wier, Chief Judge Danny Reeves and Senior Judge Joseph Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Gandy v. USA
as 0:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
James Ernest Gandy, Jr.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Sneed v. Little Sandy Correctional Complex et al
as 0:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Robert Edward Sneed
Defendant:
Little Sandy Correctional Complex, Department of Corrections, The Commonwealth of Kentucky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Travis v. Gilley
as 6:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Terrol Travis
Defendant:
Warden Gilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Krieg v. Warden of USP McCreary
as 6:2024cv00033
Petitioner:
Eric Krieg
Respondent:
Warden of USP McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hernandez v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 7:2024cv00021
Petitioner:
William Hernandez
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Moore v. Hughes
as 2:2024cv00005
Petitioner:
Michael Ernest Moore
Respondent:
Craig Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bennett et al v. USA
as 6:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Wanda Ellen Bennett and Michael Keith Bennett
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Sneed v. Airmark et al
as 0:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Robert Edward Sneed
Defendant:
Airmark, Department of Corrections, Little Sandy Correctional Complex and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woods v. Detective Rawlings et al
as 5:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Maceo Woods
Defendant:
Detective Rawlings, Lawson, Gaby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
