Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in North Dakota
Cases 71 - 80 of 1,229
Happel v. Pringle
as 3:2023cv00045
Petitioner: Tyson Happel
Respondent: North Dakota, State of and Chad Pringle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Happel v. Pringle
as 3:2023cv00046
Petitioner: Tyson Happel
Respondent: North Dakota, State of and Chad Pringle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cruz v. USA
as 3:2023cv00062
Petitioner: Ruben Joe Cruz
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Cartwright v. Doe We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00013
Plaintiff: Walter William Cartwright, III
Defendant: Jane Doe and Chantel Hillstead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lazalde v. USA
as 1:2023cv00053
Petitioner: Alejandro Lazalde
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Lazalde v. USA
as 1:2023cv00054
Petitioner: Alejandro Lazalde
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
McGarvey v. USA
as 1:2023cv00056
Petitioner: Curtis James McGarvey
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
McGinnis v. Slayer et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00018
Petitioner: Neil Adams McGinnis
Respondent: Warden James Slayer, ND DOCR, Colby Braun and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brickle-Hicks v. Sayler
as 1:2023cv00017
Petitioner: Morris Jerome Brickle-Hicks
Respondent: James Sayler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sarnor v. USA
as 3:2023cv00037
Petitioner: Zwannah Ahamadu Sarnor
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?