Environmental Matters Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 71 - 80 of 1,013
BLUE RIDGE ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE LEAGUE et al v. REGAN
as 1:2022cv03134
Plaintiff: BLUE RIDGE ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE LEAGUE, LOUISIANA BUCKET BRIGADE, MISSOURI COALITION FOR THE ENVIRONMENT and others
Defendant: MICHAEL S. REGAN
Taotao Usa, Inc., et al v. EPA, et al
as 22-5225
Plaintiff / Appellant: Taotao USA, Inc., Taotao Group Co., Ltd. and Jinyun County Xiangyuan Industry Co., Ltd.
Defendant / Appellee: Environmental Protection Agency and Phillip A. Brooks, Director, Air Enforcement Division, Office of Civil Enforcement, Office of Enforcement
STATEWIDE ORGANIZING FOR COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT et al v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY et al
as 1:2022cv02562
Plaintiff: STATEWIDE ORGANIZING FOR COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT, HOOSIER ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL, INDIANA STATE CONFERENCE AND LAPORTE COUNTY BRANCH OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and MICHAEL S. REGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Resource & Recovery Act
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY et al v. SPELLMON et al
as 1:2022cv02586
Plaintiff: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, SIERRA CLUB, MONTANA ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION CENTER and others
Defendant: LT. SCOTT A. SPELLMON and U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Intervenor Defendant: STATE OF MONTANA, AMERICAN GAS ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
Amicus Curiae: CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and EDISON ELECTRIC INSTITUTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRITY PROJECT et al v. REGAN
as 1:2022cv02243
Plaintiff: ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRITY PROJECT, CHESAPEAKE CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK and SIERRA CLUB
Defendant: MICHAEL REGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604 Clear Air Act (Emission Standards)
MAINE LOBSTERMEN'S ASSOCIATION v. NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv02509
Plaintiff: MAINE LOBSTERMEN'S ASSOCIATION
Defendant: NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO and JANET COIT
Intervenor Plaintiff: STATE OF MAINE DEPARTMENT OF MARINE RESOURCES, MASSACHUSETTS LOBSTERMAN'S ASSOC. and DISTRICT 4 LODGE OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS, LOCAL LODGE 207
Intervenor: CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION, INC., CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION et al v. FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2022cv01408
Plaintiff: ONE HUNDRED MILES, NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION, LITTLE CUMBERLAND ISLAND HOMES ASSOCIATION, INC. and others
Defendant: FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, DANIEL MURRAY and JAMES REPCHECK
Intervenor Defendant: CAMDEN COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
SAN ANTONIO BAY ESTUARINE WATERKEEPER et al v. CONNOR et al
as 1:2022cv01470
Plaintiff: SAN ANTONIO BAY ESTUARINE WATERKEEPER, TEXAS CAMPAIGN FOR THE ENVIRONMENT, TURTLE ISLAND RESTORATION NETWORK and others
Defendant: MICHAEL L CONNOR, U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, MICHAEL L. CONNOR and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
DAKOTA RESOURCE COUNCIL et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv01853
Plaintiff: DAKOTA RESOURCE COUNCIL, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, LIVING RIVERS and others
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DEBRA HAALAND, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and others
Not Classified By Court: STATE OF UTAH, STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA and others
Intervenor Defendant: STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
KELLEHER v. REGAN
as 1:2022cv01965
Plaintiff: BRIAN T. KELLEHER
Defendant: MICHAEL REGAN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?