Cases 71 - 80 of 109
THOMAS v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION et al
as 1:2007cv00049
Plaintiff:
ROBERT F. THOMAS
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION, RENZENBERGER INCORPORATED and GARY KRUPA
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
ALBERTER v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 3:2007cv00015
Plaintiff:
RICHARD M. ALBERTER
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
WEIKERT v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv00040
Plaintiff:
DORSEY D. WEIKERT, JR.
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, AMERICAN PREMIERE UNDERWRITERS and READING COMPANY
Cross Claimant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION and AMERICAN PREMIERE UNDERWRITERS
Cross Defendant:
READING COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
GOLIAS v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2007cv00003
Plaintiff:
FRANCES GOLIAS
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
VELOZ v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO.
as 3:2006cv00258
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Railway Labor Act
SULOFF v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2006cv01388
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
DUNKLE v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION et al
as 3:2006cv00213
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
CARLSON v. BUFFALO & PITTSBURGH RAILROAD, INC.
as 1:2006cv00218
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
KAUFFMAN v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION et al
as 3:2006cv00172
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
MARTRAY v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC
as 2:2006cv00918
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
