Cases 71 - 80 of 9,448
Roundtree-Cohen-McCrorey-Palmer-Mirzz-Walker-Douglas et al v. Lamont et al
as 3:2024cv00540
Plaintiff:
Queen Princess Anjaknie Roundtree-Cohen-McCrorey-Palmer-Mirzz-Walker-Douglas, Elizabeth Queen, Andrew and others
Defendant:
Ned Lamont, Jen Zarozi, Devin and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00579
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Harris v. Reeves et al
as 3:2024cv00547
Plaintiff:
Gerard Vondrake Harris
Defendant:
Robert S. Reeves, Cathy S. Palmer, Ralph Todd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00564
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Wilkens v. City of Stamford et al
as 3:2024cv00556
Plaintiff:
Samuel Wilkens
Defendant:
City of Stamford, Stamford Police Department, Costello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Steele v. Hartford Police Departm et al
as 3:2024cv00568
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Q. Steele
Defendant:
Hartford Police Departm and Hartford Superior Court
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00541
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00542
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
