Cases 71 - 80 of 17,202
McNair v. Corbin
as 1:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
Jimmie McNair and James McNair
Defendant:
Lauren Corbin, State of Maryland and Office of Public Defender
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Holtzinger v. Rowe
as 1:2024cv01030
Plaintiff:
Patrick Landon Holtzinger
Defendant:
Craig Rowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
El Bey v. Eniola et al
as 1:2024cv01040
Plaintiff:
Bro Stephen Michael El Bey
Defendant:
Eniola and Alien Foreiglier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Warden of WCI et al
as 1:2024cv00571
Plaintiff:
Kyeem King
Defendant:
Warden of WCI and Officer Fern
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00414
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee v. City of Baltimore et al
as 1:2024cv00465
Plaintiff:
Christopher Briggs Lee
Defendant:
City of Baltimore, State of Maryland and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Carlton v. Weber et al
as 1:2024cv00514
Plaintiff:
David L. Carlton
Defendant:
Shane Weber, Bradley Butler, Corizon Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Yasinov v. United States et al
as 1:2024cv00983
Plaintiff:
Igor Yasinov
Defendant:
United States, Officer Bryant, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mellotte v. Reyes et al
as 1:2024cv00982
Plaintiff:
Randall Mellotte
Defendant:
Ofc. M. Reyes, Ofc. R. Smith, Lt. G. Forney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Bennet et al
as 1:2024cv00497
Plaintiff:
Roderick Johnson
Defendant:
Officer Bennet and Officer Wolff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
