Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Cases 71 - 80 of 53,736
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00524
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
DeBrahl-Daniels v. Neely
as 7:2024cv00519
Petitioner: Leatrice Malika DeBrahl-Daniels
Defendant: Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Turman v. Von Maur Inc
as 2:2024cv00521
Defendant: Von Maur Inc and Von Maur Stores Inc
Plaintiff: Lisa Jackson Turman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Berry v. Bailey et al
as 5:2024cv00522
Plaintiff: Heath Berry
Defendant: William C Bailey, Robert E (Bud) Cramer, Jim Scanlon and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00252
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Pascual v. Martinez et al
as 4:2024cv00513
Plaintiff: Angelica Pascual
Defendant: Cesar G Martinez and Crane Transport Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Giles v. Spring Oaks Capital LLC
as 2:2024cv00514
Plaintiff: Krashunda Giles
Defendant: Spring Oaks Capital LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Posey et al v. Hammer
as 2:2024cv00515
Plaintiff: Veronica A Posey and Zhari A Posey
Defendant: Harvey B Hammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
May v. TransUnion Credit Bureau et al
as 1:2024cv00270
Plaintiff: Jamie Christopher May
Defendant: TransUnion Credit Bureau and William Bill Pate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Levitt v. U.S. Internal Revenue Service
as 2:2024cv00285
Plaintiff: Ronald Levitt
Defendant: U.S. Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?