Cases 71 - 80 of 2,130
Jones v. Kwik Shop, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
Omar Jones
Defendant:
Kwik Shop Inc. and Kwik Shop, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Murphy v. Kimberly Ayotte
as 4:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
Benjamin M Murphy and Benjamin M. Murphy
Defendant:
State of Iowa, Kimberly Ayotte, Shannon Hutchison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Petersen v. City of Newton, Iowa et al
as 4:2023cv00408
Petitioner:
Noah James Petersen
Defendant:
City of Newton, Iowa, Michael Hansen and Rob Burdess
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 020
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Bell v. Marlin et al
as 4:2023cv00331
Plaintiff:
Larry Allen Bell
Defendant:
Connor Marlin, Dave Thomas, Rusty Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Petersen v. City of Newton, Iowa et al
as 4:2023cv00407
Plaintiff:
Noah James Petersen
Defendant:
City of Newton, Iowa, Michael Hansen and Rob Burdess
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Swint v. United Nations et al
as 4:2023cv00370
Plaintiff:
Robert James Swint
Defendant:
United Nations, U.N. Resolution 1441, 2015 Paris Climate Agreement and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
