Cases 71 - 80 of 5,455
Dedeaux v. Hancock County et al
as 1:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Abel J. Dedeaux
Defendant:
Hancock County, City of Bay St. Louis, MS, Anthony Gambino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Green v. Allied First Bank sb
as 3:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
LaKeisha C. Green
Defendant:
Allied First Bank sb doing business as Servbank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Laster et al v. Rankin County School District
as 3:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Phillip Laster, Sr. and Ashanta Laster
Defendant:
Rankin County School District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mills v. Dye et al
as 2:2023cv00206
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mills
Defendant:
Darrell DJ Dye, Perry County, Mississippi, Mitch Nobles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peters et al v. Fuller et al
as 2:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Bridgett Peters and Patrick Peters
Defendant:
Seth Fuller, Derek Harris, Colby Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Penton v. City of Pearl, Mississippi
as 3:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Keith Penton
Defendant:
City of Pearl, Mississippi and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
