Cases 71 - 80 of 763
Bowers v. Environmental Mechanical Contractors, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00717
Plaintiff:
Eric Bowers
Defendant:
Environmental Mechanical Contractors, Inc. and Thomas LoScalzo
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
UMB Bank N.A. v. Benton et al
as 4:2021cv00710
Plaintiff:
UMB Bank N.A.
Defendant:
Jessie Benton, Anthony Gude, Daria Lyman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Bowers v. Metrowire Media, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00719
Plaintiff:
Eric Bowers
Defendant:
Metrowire Media, LLC, Russell Pearson and Lisa Shackelford
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
***CASE ABANDONED SEE 3:21-5089-CV-SW-SRB OPENED IN ERROR*** v. Thomas et al
as 3:2021cv05088
Defendant:
Mr. Andrew Thomas and Mr. George Martin
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Geographic Location Innovations LLC v. FitVine Sales, Inc.
as 5:2021cv06107
Plaintiff:
Geographic Location Innovations LLC
Defendant:
FitVine Sales, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Thomas v. Martin
as 3:2021cv05089
Plaintiff:
Mr. Andrew Thomas and Andrew Thomas
Defendant:
Mr. George Martin and George Martin
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
MAD Brewing Company v. Hirshfeld et al
as 4:2021cv00709
Plaintiff:
MAD Brewing Company
Defendant:
Drew Hirshfeld and United States Patent and Trademark Office
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Provisur Technologies, Inc. v. Weber, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv06113
Plaintiff:
Provisur Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
Weber, Inc., Weber Maschinenbau GmbH Breidenbach and Weber Maschinenbau GmbH Neubrandenburg
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Bowers v. Spa 7, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00716
Plaintiff:
Eric Bowers
Defendant:
Spa 7, LLC doing business as Crossroads Spa and Stacey Rupe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Campbell v. Gannett Company, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00557
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Campbell
Defendant:
Gannett Company, Inc., USATODAY SPORTS MEDIA GROUP, LLC, THE NEWS JOURNAL MEDIA GROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
