Cases 71 - 80 of 49,901
King v. Kevin et al
as 1:2024cv02949
Plaintiff:
Kejohna King
Defendant:
Jodice Kevin, Edgar Kevin, Salazaa Gilberto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seymour v. Miller et al
as 1:2024cv02855
Plaintiff:
Ernest Peter Seymour, Jr.
Defendant:
Harold Miller, C.O. James Schonmann, Daniel Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chapman-Green v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv01449
Plaintiff:
Jaheim A. Chapman-Green
Defendant:
The City of New York Police Department, City of New York and Officer Mark A. Matias
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pittman v. Fulton County Police Department
as 1:2024cv02898
Plaintiff:
Nadira A. Pittman
Defendant:
Fulton County Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pittman v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv02906
Plaintiff:
Nadira A. Pittman
Defendant:
The Mark Atlanta Georgia and State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pittman v. United States Government
as 1:2024cv02909
Plaintiff:
Nadira A. Pittman
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pittman v. Clayton County Jail
as 1:2024cv02897
Plaintiff:
Nadira A. Pittman
Defendant:
Clayton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chen v. Miller
as 1:2024cv02855
Plaintiff:
Wu Long Chen
Defendant:
M. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marozzi v. Interlicchia et al
as 6:2024cv06223
Plaintiff:
Quentin A. Marozzi
Defendant:
Nicholas Interlicchia, Matthew Daminski, L. Strapp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morinville v. Upstate Correctional Facility RRU et al
as 9:2024cv00531
Plaintiff:
Carlos Morinville
Defendant:
Upstate Correctional Facility RRU, Doe 1, Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
