Cases 71 - 80 of 2,004
Jaquez v. Cherokee County et al
as 6:2023cv00410
Plaintiff:
Henry Joseph Jaquez
Defendant:
Cherokee County, John Bennett, Haley Robison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
St. Clair v. Quick
as 6:2023cv00338
Petitioner:
Michael St. Clair
Respondent:
Christe Quick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Gaines v. Spitner et al
as 6:2023cv00390
Plaintiff:
Trevon D. Gaines
Defendant:
Mrs. Spitner, Mrs. Birdshead, Mr. Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weinert v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 6:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
Steven Alexander Weinert
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Attorney General, Pushmataha County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kasper v. Atwood et al
as 6:2023cv00394
Plaintiff:
Nathan Robert Frank Kasper
Defendant:
Devra Atwood, Clay Linter, Jenny Saunders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Rainbolt
as 6:2023cv00397
Plaintiff:
Joshua Duane Butler
Defendant:
Carmen Rainbolt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stubbs v. USA
as 6:2023cv00393
Petitioner:
John Duncan Stubbs
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Ree v. USA
as 6:2023cv00386
Petitioner:
Miranda Lynne Ree
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Trotter v. Harpe
as 6:2023cv00348
Petitioner:
Jared M Trotter and Jared M. Trotter
Respondent:
Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oakes v. Merritt et al
as 6:2023cv00334
Plaintiff:
Randall Wayne Oakes
Defendant:
Kevin Merritt, State of Oklahoma and Leflore County Courts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
