Cases 81 - 90 of 344
O'Donnell v. Sanopi U.S. et al
as 4:2019cv40042
Defendant:
Sanopi U.S., Merck and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Neil J. O'Donnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Feeley v. Baker et al
as 4:2018cv40211
Defendant:
Governor Charlie Baker, Robert Huge, William Francis Galvin and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Shawn Feeley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Espinosa v. Joiner et al
as 1:2018cv12196
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma, L.P., Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., Allergan PLC and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Espinosa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DeJesus et al v. Family Health Center of Worcester, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv40168
Defendant:
Family Health Center of Worcester, Inc., Matthew Collins, MD, Julie Wright and others
Plaintiff:
Astrid DeJesus and Luis DeJesus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Kakar v. United States of America et al
as 1:2018cv12056
Plaintiff:
Farida Kakar
Defendant:
United States of America, R.N. Robin M. Smith and Steward Good Samaritan Medical Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Williams et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 1:2018cv11830
Plaintiff:
Fred Williams and Brenda Harris
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp
Rejouis et al v. Kogut et al
as 1:2018cv11458
Defendant:
Good Samaritan Medical Center and Amy Kogut
Plaintiff:
Marsha Philemond, Diony Rejouis, Coligny, PPA Rejouis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Clarke et al v. Bengtson et al
as 1:2018cv11409
Defendant:
Sarah C Lassey, Joan M Bengtson, M.D., John Doe Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Berdine Ryan Clarke and O. L.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fernandes v. Hoch et al
as 1:2018cv11252
Defendant:
Zwi Hoch and Good Samaritan Medical Center
Plaintiff:
Laurinda Fernandes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Saunders v. Roefaro et al
as 1:2018cv11153
Defendant:
John Roefaro and Todd Paul
Plaintiff:
Wendell L. Saunders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
