Cases 81 - 90 of 1,938
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
BREWINGTON v. MCKINNEY et al
as 2:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
NOAH BREWINGTON
Defendant:
ROY E MCKINNEY, AARON FEY, HOWARD JOHNSON BY WYNDHAM and others
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - NON PRISONER IFP CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCBREAIRTY v. MILLER et al
as 1:2023cv00143
Plaintiff:
SHAWN MCBREAIRTY
Defendant:
HEATH MILLER and SCHOOL BOARD OF RSU22
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
MCCURDY v. TOWN OF BRUNSWICK et al
as 2:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
PRESCOTT MCCURDY
Defendant:
TOWN OF BRUNSWICK, JOHN ELDRIDGE, OFFICER HODGDON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
DOYLE v. MAKSYMOWICZ et al
as 2:2023cv00139
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A DOYLE
Defendant:
ANN MAKSYMOWICZ, CHARLES RUMMSEY, JONATHAN SAHRBECK, ESQ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DIMILLO v. TOWN OF FALMOUTH et al
as 2:2023cv00130
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA DIMILLO
Defendant:
TOWN OF FALMOUTH, KEVIN CONGER, PETER THERIAULT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
