Cases 81 - 90 of 16,910
Ricardo Devengoechea v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
as 24-1518
Plaintiff:
RICARDO DEVENGOECHEA
Defendant:
BOLIVARIAN REPUBLIC OF VENEZUELA, a foreign state
City of Roanoke, Virginia et al v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 2:2024cv00559
Not Yet Classified:
INSULIN PRICING LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
City of Roanoke, Virginia and Roanoke City School Board
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, NOVO NORDISK INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
SUNDERLAND et al v. SEASON 4, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv04074
Petitioner:
PHARMACARE U.S., INC.
Plaintiff:
LINDA SUNDERLAND and BENJAMIN BINDER
Defendant:
PHARMACARE LABORATORIES PTY LTD.
Respondent:
SEASON 4, LLC
SUNDERLAND et al v. SEASON 4, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv04074
Petitioner:
PHARMACARE U.S., INC.
Plaintiff:
LINDA SUNDERLAND and BENJAMIN BINDER
Defendant:
PHARMACARE LABORATORIES PTY LTD.
Respondent:
SEASON 4, LLC
RIVERA v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00491
Plaintiff:
GIOVANNI RIVERA
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
DOHERTY v. WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE et al
as 2:2024cv00362
Plaintiff:
Dawn Doherty, F/K/A Dawn Furlong and Dawn Furlong
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, WELLS FARGO BANK, WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL SERVICES COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
399 WESTVIEW ASSOCIATES INC. v. PMG NEW JERSEY II, LLC
as 3:2024cv00636
Plaintiff:
399 WESTVIEW ASSOCIATES INC and 399 WESTVIEW ASSOCIATES INC.
Defendant:
PMG NEW JERSEY II, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2801 Petroleum Marketing Practices Act
TODD JR. v. CAPITOL ONE
as 2:2024cv00501
Plaintiff:
CHARLES THOMAS TODD JR.
Defendant:
CAPITOL ONE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
