Cases 81 - 90 of 226,945
MATTA v. KAUR et al
as 2:2024cv05743
Plaintiff:
RAHUL MATTA
Defendant:
ANTER PREET KAUR, HARINDER PAL SINGH, KAMALJIT KAUR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MOSS v. MOSS et al
as 2:2024cv05753
Defendant:
JEANNE E MOSS, JEANNE E JEFFERSON, NEW JERSEY CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID MOSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05766
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05787
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
HELVEY v. NULOOM, LLC
as 3:2024cv05765
Plaintiff:
JILLIAN HELVEY
Defendant:
NULOOM, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
LOMA LICENCIAMENTO DE MARCAS LTDA et al v. LY BERDITCHEV CORP.
as 2:2024cv05759
Plaintiff:
LOMA LICENCIAMENTO DE MARCAS LTDA and TRUSS COSMETICS CORP.
Defendant:
LY BERDITCHEV CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Trademark Infringement
MORAN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv05777
Plaintiff:
CHARISE M MORAN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
MCBETH v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv05776
Plaintiff:
ASHLEE P MCBETH
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
BRUCE v. T-MOBILE USA INC.
as 2:2024cv05721
Petitioner:
NELSON L. BRUCE
Respondent:
T-MOBILE USA INC.
Interested Party:
REV FEDERAL CREDIT UNION and TRANS UNION, LLC.
FUREY v. LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2024cv05770
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FUREY
Defendant:
LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, JOHN DOES (1-10) and ABC CORPS (1-10)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4001 National Insurance Flood Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
