Cases 81 - 90 of 32,636
Akram v. United States Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service
as 3:2024cv30034
Plaintiff:
Naila Akram
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7422 Appeal from Administrative Decision
Wells v. Pierce et al
as 1:2024fp00100
Plaintiff:
Brian K. Wells
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc., BOFA Securities, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Duarte Cabrera v. Garland
as 24-1352
Petitioner:
RAFAEL DUARTE CABRERA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
In Re: Searson
as 24-8012
Respondent:
WILLIAM SEARSON
Interested Party:
MASSACHUSETTS SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT and MA BOARD OF BAR OVERSEERS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Sky Tower Puerto Rico Inc. v. Departamento De Desarrollo Economico y Comercio et al
as 3:2024cv01173
Plaintiff:
SKY TOWER PUERTO RICO INC.
Defendant:
DEPARTAMENTO DE DESARROLLO ECONMICO Y COMERCIO, OFICINA DE GERENCIA DE PERMISOS, Telecommunications Regulatory Board of Puerto Rico and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
US v. Lugo-Montalvo
as 24-1344
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
ALAN LUGO-MONTALVO, a/k/a Allan Lugo-Montalvo
Interested Party:
EMMA M. GREENWOOD, OSCAR JOSE SERRANO NEGRON and KEHYLIS YOLANDA VAZQUEZ-TORRES
Das et al v. Lowell Five Cents Savings Bank et al
as 1:2024cv10931
Plaintiff:
Abhijit Das, Mitra Das, Dr Mukti Das and others
Defendant:
Lowell Five Cents Savings Bank, David Wallace, John Pratt, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Kline v. Primis Bank
as 1:2024cv10929
Plaintiff:
Robert Kline
Defendant:
Primis Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
