Cases 81 - 90 of 12,103
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00911
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gage v. City of Baton Rouge/Parish of East Baton Rouge et al
as 3:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Gage
Defendant:
City of Baton Rouge/Parish of East Baton Rouge and Matthew Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Parker v. Facebook et al
as 2:2024cv00602
Plaintiff:
Stefano Markell Parker
Defendant:
Facebook and Meta
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Fernandez et al v. Louisiana Department of Children and Family Services et al
as 3:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
B. Jacob, S Joseph, M Amelia and others
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Children and Family Services, David N Matlock and Jeffrey Landry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Lawrence et al
as 3:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Randall Williams
Defendant:
Troy Lawrence, Jr., Joseph Carboni, James Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Pete v. Wright et al
as 2:2024cv00879
Plaintiff:
Norman Pete
Defendant:
Charles Gary Wain Wright, Assistant District Attorney and Powell Wingfield Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00891
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
