Cases 81 - 90 of 6,728
Toon v. Spann et al
as 5:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Steven Glen Toon
Defendant:
Officer Michael Andrew Spann, Officer Jonathan Sholar and The City of Hopkinsville, Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Gerstle v. Kentucky Office of Unemployment Insurance et al
as 3:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Zoe Gerstle
Defendant:
Kentucky Office of Unemployment Insurance, Sherrell Clay and Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Morgan v. Hopkinsville Police Department et al
as 5:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
DeWayne A. Morgan
Defendant:
Hopkinsville Police Department, Major Ceasar Sierra, Captain Todd DeArmond and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Farrow v. Vanceburg
as 0:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Janet Farrow
Defendant:
City of Vanceburg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Adcock v. Hopkins County Board Of Education et al
as 4:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Kaylie Adcock
Defendant:
Hopkins County Board Of Education and Elizabeth Barlow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Smith v. Bullit Co CHFS et al
as 3:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Antonio Allen Smith
Defendant:
Bullit Co CHFS and Commonwealth Cabinet for Health and Family Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
