Cases 81 - 90 of 10,362
VAN NESS v. COUNTRYMAN et al
as 4:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
KEVIS VAN NESS
Defendant:
Sheriff GREGORY COUNTRYMAN, Lieutenant HARBERT, Sgt MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00077
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
SNYDER v. SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS et al
as 5:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
ERIC EUGENE SNYDER, SR
Defendant:
SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS, BORIUDIN, LIEUTENANT BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRYOR v. DOOLY STATE PRISON, et al
as 5:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
ERIK E PRYOR
Defendant:
DOOLY STATE PRISON, NURSE ARMSTRONG and NURSE ALTMA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
ADAN v. AMERICAN WHITE GOVERNMENT
as 3:2024cv00008
Petitioner:
SALEEVAN ADAN
Respondent:
AMERICAN WHITE GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NEWTON v. MOORE et al
as 3:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
MARQUIES NEWTON
Defendant:
SHERIFF MICHAEL MOORE, SGT KELLY and OFFICER CHILDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JORDAN v. MACON STATE PRISON
as 5:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
MARCUS JORDAN
Defendant:
MACON STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. HEREDITARY NATIVE AMERICAN SEMINOLE WAR CHIEFTAIN
as 5:2024cv00074
Petitioner:
NEGUERIAN SIMONE WRIGHT
Respondent:
HEREDITARY NATIVE AMERICAN SEMINOLE WAR CHIEFTAIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
