Cases 81 - 90 of 13,746
MCKINNEY v. JESTER et al
as 5:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE LAMONTE MCKINNEY, JR.
Defendant:
WARDEN T JESTER, DEPUTY WARDEN M GRAHAM, DEPUTY WARDEN N BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Haddix et al
as 4:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Arttie Price
Defendant:
Rachel Haddix, Nurse Medical Department, Officer Mail Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hairston v. Fulton County Jail
as 1:2024cv00666
Plaintiff:
Douglas Hairston
Defendant:
Fulton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rice v. Oliver et al
as 4:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Rice
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver and Christopher M Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKINNEY v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE LAMONTE MCKINNEY, JR.
Defendant:
TYRONE OLIVER, STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, Warden ANTOINE CALDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diarra v. Bell et al
as 1:2024cv00679
Plaintiff:
Moussa Diarra
Defendant:
Sgt. Bell, Officer Hood and DeKalb County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dorsey v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv01410
Plaintiff:
Julius Dorsey
Defendant:
Russell W. Smith and Chan B. Caudell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOWMAN v. JONES et al
as 4:2024cv00043
Petitioner:
ERICK DAWAYNE BOWMAN
Respondent:
JONES, WILLIE WILSON and RUTLEDGE STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Unknown
as 1:2024cv00542
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Bailey
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrell v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv00576
Plaintiff:
Kenneth L. Morrell
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Georgia and Fulton County Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
