Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,347
Boone v. Mack
as 1:2024cv00067
Petitioner: George Boone, Jr.
Respondent: State Of Alabama and Huey Hoss Mack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Huey v. McCall et al
as 1:2024cv00059
Plaintiff: William Bart Huey
Defendant: Captain McCall and Officer McKinney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conner v. USA
as 1:2024cv00131
Petitioner: Daniel Dewayne Conner
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Orso v. Jackson
as 1:2024cv00124
Plaintiff: Ricky A. Orso, Jr.
Defendant: Heath Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Greene v. Pipes et al
as 1:2024cv00122
Plaintiff: Raymond Shane Greene
Defendant: Wesley S. Pipes, Mary B. Windom, Mark S. Tunstall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perez v. USA
as 1:2024cv00121
Petitioner: Yuri Maikel Hernandez Perez
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
McLemore v. Holt We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00048
Plaintiff: Wesley McLemore
Defendant: Kathy Holt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Guy v. Burch
as 1:2024cv00115
Petitioner: Vernon Guy
Respondent: Paul Burch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harrison v. Peters et al
as 1:2024cv00113
Petitioner: Winston L. Harrison
Respondent: Kenneth Peters and Lanetta Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Strong v. Dallas County Commission et al
as 2:2024cv00105
Defendant: Elizabeth Daniels, Dallas County Commission, Dallas County Sheriff's Department and others
Plaintiff: Denise Strong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?